Latest Red Sea container attack jitters oil prices

In response to an assault on Sunday, Maersk reroutes all scheduled voyages around the coast of Africa, raising concerns about increased costs for numerous imported products originating from Asia.

Two of the world’s largest container ship operators have extended their Red Sea diversions after a weekend vessel attack. This incident is attributed to the resurgence of volatility in oil prices.

Maersk halted all voyages near or through the Suez Canal on Sunday in retaliation for the Houthi militants’ targeting of one of its behemoth carriers, the Maersk Hangzhou; this was the latest in a series of attacks against shipping vessels since November.

US military helicopters sunk three watercraft in response to a distress call early New Year’s Eve, killing 10 insurgents.

The reaction was part of a pledge made last month by multiple naval powers, including the United Kingdom, to safeguard international shipping in the region following threats from Yemeni insurgents to attack any vessel believed to be serving Israel.

Additionally, the Houthis, backed by Iran, are affiliated with Hamas. This organization launched the attack on Israel in early October, sparking a regional conflict with the potential to escalate.

Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd Divert Routes Amidst Security Concerns

Maersk issued the following statement: “As an investigation into the incident continues, we will maintain a halt on all cargo movement through the area while we conduct additional assessments of the situation’s constant evolution.”

We will reroute vessels to circumnavigate the Cape of Good Hope when it is best for our clients.

It was widely believed that Maersk had over thirty container ships prepared to transit Suez via the Red Sea.

Its decision was made immediately after a similar action was taken by competitor Hapag-Lloyd.

Until at least January 9th, the German company stated earlier on Tuesday that it would continue to divert its vessels away from the Suez Canal and route them via the Cape of Good Hope.

The fifth-largest container liner in the world stated that it would then determine whether or not to maintain the diversion.

Since December 15, when one of its vessels was targeted off the coast of Yemen, it has remained in position.

The Suez Canal facilitates approximately one-third of the total global container ship voyages.

The diversions may delay Asian cruises circumnavigating Africa by two weeks.

Economic Ramifications and Market Reactions Post-Maersk Incident

The costs incurred thus far as a result of the disruption—insurance premiums, fuel-related shipping charges, and crew expenses—are anticipated to be transferred to the supply chain in the coming weeks and months.

The aftermath of the Maersk liner attack was evident upon the resumption of financial markets following the New Year’s holiday.

At one point, Brent crude oil was trading 2% higher at $78 (£62) per barrel.

Market analysts said speculators worried about a wider Middle Eastern supply interruption.

Leon Li, an analyst at CMC Markets based in Shanghai, speculated that the escalation in tensions in the Red Sea over the weekend and the highest demand season during China’s spring festival—in reference to the Lunar New Year holiday in early February—could impact the price of oil.

Later in the day, when US markets opened, oil prices were unchanged. This was attributed to investors’ expectations regarding interest rate cuts diminishing, thereby containing oil price gains.

Additionally, a stronger dollar impacted pricing.

In Q4 2023, BYD outsells Tesla in electric car sales

One thought on “Latest Red Sea container attack jitters oil prices

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *