In spite of the recent recovery in crude prices, BP fell short of its projected earnings for the third quarter.
For the three months ending in September, analysts had anticipated the oil supermajor to disclose an underlying replacement cost profit of $4 billion (£3.3 billion), which is its preferred metric. However, the company only generated $3.3 billion (£2.7 billion).
Early trading saw BP shares decline 5%, but they regained some ground to trade down 3.9% at 10:30 a.m.
Factors Impacting Profitability
Inadequate performance by BP’s gas marketing and trading division and a $540 million pre-tax impairment charge on three wind farms off the northeastern coast of the United States both impacted profitability.
Since the conclusion of summer, the price of oil has increased due to several factors, including declining production volumes, burgeoning Chinese demand, and, most recently, the Israeli-Hamas conflict.
Due to escalating costs, BP and Equinor, the Norwegian energy behemoth, are attempting to renegotiate the agreement for the Empire Wind and Beacon Wind projects. However, New York authorities have thus far denied this request.
In addition, profits decreased by 60% compared to the $10.8 billion generated during the corresponding period of the previous year, as oil and gas prices surged due to the relaxation of Covid-related restrictions and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
Prior to their recovery this summer, prices declined substantially from autumn 2023 to this summer, as OPEC+ states announced they would prolong crude oil production cuts through 2024 and the Chinese government eased draconian lockdown restrictions.
Following a dividend increase in the previous quarter, BP maintained its present dividend of 4% on the immensely popular stock among individual British investors. However, BP announced an additional share repurchase of £1.2 million, continuing a program in which the company has repurchased its own undervalued stock.
Richard Hunter, head of markets at Interactive Investor, stated, “It appears likely that the company will continue to place a high priority on shareholder returns.”
CEO Resignation and Impact
When considering the recent departure of the CEO in a broader sense, certain inquiries persist. In contrast to the hefty penalties in the billions of dollars that ensued after the Deepwater Horizon spill, the momentary decline in oil futures prices, and the reduction in dividends implemented throughout the pandemic, the resignation of BP’s CEO is unexpected but arguably not a significant development in the company’s past.
“Since a temporary replacement has been verified, BP hopes the markets will view the situation as routine.”
Nevertheless, an element of unpredictability will persist until a permanent replacement is identified and the organization provides clarification regarding any potential alterations to its present approach.
BP shares have increased by 5.5% over the past year and are currently trading at 506.1p, a 160% increase from their pandemic nadir of just under 200p.
The interim CEO of the organization, Murray Auchinloss, remarked, “This has been a solid quarter, bolstered by solid underlying operational performance that demonstrates our continued commitment to delivery.”
Auchinloss assumed leadership of BP last month following the resignation of CEO Bernard Looney, who admitted to the board that he had not been “completely transparent” regarding his relationships with other staff members.
Looney, a BP veteran of more than three decades, was appointed CEO in 2020, during a period of significant turmoil for the organization due to the precipitous decline in oil and gas sales precipitated by the Covid-19 pandemic.
He pledged to enhance the environmental standing of the London-based conglomerate by establishing goals to achieve absolute net-zero emissions from all BP operations by the middle of the century.
However, the company’s disclosure of annual profits that had more than doubled to £23 billion in 2022 on the same day infuriated climate activists and curtailed these aspirations.
BP’s Environmental Commitments
BP has revised its target for reducing carbon emissions from its upstream oil and gas operations from 35 to 40 percent to 20 to 30 percent by the end of this decade.
In the midst of this setback, the company has additionally increased shareholder returns by revealing a $1.5 billion share repurchase program and a 7.27 cents per share dividend on Tuesday.
A think tank researcher at The Institute for Public Policy Research, Joseph Evans, charged that BP “placed profit ahead of people and the environment.”
“At a time when energy corporations should be urgently responding to climate change by moving investments away from fossil fuels, BP has doubled down on its oil and gas sector to reward shareholders with over a billion in buybacks and huge profits.” he continued.
Should people fix with E.On for two years to save £50 on energy?
